5 ms·
Source?
by jorgenveisdal 5y ago
Source?
- DevilMadeMeDoIT 5y ago"Szeged in 1934" [0] "I heard subsequently that the position that had been offered to me was divided into four pieces" [0] https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Ford/Lorch219-230.pdf https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/2...
- wging 5y agoThe OP says: > This essay is based on the article “Szeged in 1934”, which was compiled by Reuben Hersh from two manuscripts of Lorch’s for a proposed book on mathematics in Hungary. Based on it, yes -- to the extent that you should just read the original. I'm not sure if the OP article really counts as plagiarism, but it's not worth reading when the original is right here.
- readthenotes1 5y agoOh the horses of Szegad!
- throwaway81523 5y agoI gave up reading the Cantor's Attic articles that keep getting linked from HN. They are all rehashes of well known stuff from other sources. Yes though, the Lorch article was excellent (I read it some time ago).