3 ms·
I don't know Clojure (not sure how expressive it is), but for a framework isn't the code too less? I have seen other frameworks, but they are quite large (in te
by elevenE 15y ago
I don't know Clojure (not sure how expressive it is), but for a framework isn't the code too less? I have seen other frameworks, but they are quite large (in terms of LOC.) Is it that they contain more functionality?
- nickik 15y agoThe clojure culture tents to build extremly small librarys that are really composable. Look at this video about simplicity (http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/java-jee/radical-simplicity/js-2051 http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/java-jee/radical-simplicity/...) it translates very nicly to the web librarys. In a nutshell: Make small simple things even if thats ends up beeing a bit more verbose then if you would have built it as one thing. If time shows that a set of librarys works very nicly together then you can write something new that combines these in a nice way. This is what the Noir does it just pulls together some librarys and delivers them in a nice package.
- puredanger 15y agoIf Clojure is too concise, you can always write a library to apply a more cumbersome syntax if you'd like.