41 ms·
Same here. I believe they have a different "calling", Chrome is meant to be fast,light and simple. Firefox feature-heavy and complex, a sort of web swiss knife
by Kurtz79 15y ago
Same here. I believe they have a different "calling", Chrome is meant to be fast,light and simple.
Firefox feature-heavy and complex, a sort of web swiss knife.
While they are evolving towards implementing each other's strengths (Firefox more streamlined, Chrome more feature-laden) they kind of stay true to their origins.
I tend to use Chrome a lot more, but I always keep Firefox installed and updated as well.
- Xixi 15y agoThere's so much (unintended) irony in your post. Firefox was supposed to be the fast, light and simple replacement of Mozilla... And I would be glad if it could come back to this original intent: on my rather underpowered laptop I use mostly Chrome and Safari, Firefox is just way too slow.