3 ms·
Not under-population, per se, but low rates of growth.
by frosted-flakes 6y ago
Not under-population, per se, but low rates of growth.
- cromwellian 6y agoLow rates of growth lead to a population collapse in 2 generations or so and an inverted demographic pyramid where mostly old people exist with few youngsters. Not a good recipe for the species or a civilization. Look at predicted population numbers in Japan for example.
- SamBam 6y agoI'm unsure how low rates of growth in Europe will lead to a collapse of the species.