> There are two equal and opposite ways for that assumption to be false Hm? There are many ways for pricing to occur if EMH is not true, not two equal and oppo

> There are two equal and opposite ways for that assumption to be false Hm? There are many ways for pricing to occur if EMH is not true, not two equal and opposite ways (how are they opposite in magnitude?) Anyway I think this is not going to be a fruitful conversation going forward since I'm not interested in showing all the way markets without pareto-optimal outcomes can fail, so cheers.