4 ms·
The article is about the improvements since Java 8. In other words the title should be read as "[Java 11/14/etc is so good that] you can't afford to run [i.e.,
by mrighele 6y ago
The article is about the improvements since Java 8.
In other words the title should be read as "[Java 11/14/etc is so good that] you can't afford to run [i.e., stay on] Java 8"
I agree that the title was a poor choice though.
- mikemybytes 6y agoThanks for the feedback! (author's here) I promise to be more careful when picking up the title next time. I hope that the article's content somehow compensated that ;)