> The ESA analysis was perfectly correct, for the launch rates they were projecting. Can you prove that they were 'perfectly correct'. In my opinion historica

> The ESA analysis was perfectly correct, for the launch rates they were projecting. Can you prove that they were 'perfectly correct'. In my opinion historically ESA cost estimations have been utterly terrible. And those estimations were based on technology and cost available to ESA. In fact literally all the leaders of SpaceX, not just Musk, basically said this analysis is wrong. Even at 12 launches per year, SpaceX would have wanted to to re-usability.