3 ms·
"Heck, we can't even identify the proper causal relationship for events happening around us right now. Then how about going N centuries back and trying to reaso
by hutzlibu 6y ago
"Heck, we can't even identify the proper causal relationship for events happening around us right now. Then how about going N centuries back and trying to reason about the involved parties and their intents"
Part of the reason we do not understand much of today, is that much is done behind closed doors.
So historians does have an edge when trying to make sense of an event 80 years ago with (allmost) all relevant documents now open and the people dead, than trying to make sense of an event 5 years ago, with people involved still trying to influence every investigation etc.
Going further back in time, especially to a time with no or burned down archives, is harder, agreed.
- bluetomcat 6y agoDocuments and other preserved artifacts are often a very "low-res" view of what actually drives the course of events. Even with a well-ordered chronological archive of documents, there are far too many dots to connect between any two of them. Connecting the dots ultimately comes down to interpretation and creating a narrative. And narrative-based history is almost always wrong, deceptive and politically-inspired.