2 ms·
If you are happy with running it only once in the container, yes. But if you run it first in the container to see whether is does anything bad and then run it
by usr1106 6y ago
If you are happy with running it only once in the container, yes.
But if you run it first in the container to see whether is does anything bad and then run it on the host (or a more valuable container), no.
The script might check whether it runs in a container. It might depend on the wall clock time. On /dev/urandom, whatever. As somebody already mentioned, the halting problem. No can do.
- aroulin 6y agodoesn't the halting problem only hold if you have infinite memory?
- usr1106 6y agoThat's probably correct. But any reasonable execution environment has so many states that doing a full enumeration is infeasible.
- rgoulter 6y agoI've seen this argument that 'halting problem is undecideable': http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/loopsnoop.html http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/loopsnoop.html The argument doesn't rely on infinite memory.
- usr1106 6y agoWith finite memory and no external inputs an observer can enumerate all possible states. In real systems external inputs provide an infinite source of "memory" to read from.