5 ms·
Because the author, Cherie Hu, is softly bigoted against white men. Per her Twitter, she views concentrations of white men in the music industry as "alarming"
by neartheplain 6y ago
Because the author, Cherie Hu, is softly bigoted against white men.
Per her Twitter, she views concentrations of white men in the music industry as "alarming" and "egregious." She encourages artists to boycott lineups where white men happen to comprise the majority of the artists. Her twitter replies, likes, and selective capitalization of white/Black indicate a strong ideological alignment.
https://twitter.com/cheriehu42/status/1267836435756978179 https://twitter.com/cheriehu42/status/1267836435756978179
https://twitter.com/cheriehu42/status/1327347401368211456 https://twitter.com/cheriehu42/status/1327347401368211456
https://twitter.com/cheriehu42/status/1267874338298003457 https://twitter.com/cheriehu42/status/1267874338298003457
- phroobster 6y agoSoftly bigoted? She is blatantly racist and sexist against white men. If she made those same tweets but “white male” was replaced with “black female” it would be enough to get fired from most jobs.
- DC1350 6y agoIt’s easier to replace the word “white” with “Jewish” since the arguments about disproportionate wealth and representation will still hold. Everyone knows that’s wrong, so I don’t know why they think white is any better.
- parsimoniousplb 6y agoYes, but the British Empire was a thing, which is why "white" can be mocked and ridiculed in ways unimaginable to any other ethnicity. Science tells us so...
- plugger 6y ago*is a thing. It's called the Commonwealth now. And I'd rather be mocked when compared to being oppressed and treated as second class citizens or slaves as other ethnic groups have by the British Empire.
- parsimoniousplb 6y agoGood boy! Fetch!
- dang 6y agoUnsubstantive and/or flamebait comments will get you banned here. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting to HN, we'd be grateful.
- brendoelfrendo 6y agoOk, you explain to me why pointing out that a scant 5 c-suite executives at major recording studios are Black is racist.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- johnflanigan 6y agoThat approach to white/Black capitalization is pretty standard, it's the same approach the Associated Press uses: https://apnews.com/article/9105661462 https://apnews.com/article/9105661462
- neartheplain 6y agoThat style is not an industry consensus. For example, the Washington Post- not a conservative paper by any stretch of the imagination- capitalizes both terms, for the reasoning outlined here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2020/07/29/washington-post-announces-writing-style-changes-racial-ethnic-identifiers/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2020/07/29/washington-post...
- johnflanigan 6y agoThat's fair, maybe standard was too strong a description. However, following the AP Stylebook doesn't indicate a strong ideological alignment, at least to me.
- neartheplain 6y agoThe first statement in that AP link is ideological: >AP’s style is now to capitalize Black in a racial, ethnic or cultural sense, conveying an essential and shared sense of history, identity and community among people who identify as Black, including those in the African diaspora and within Africa. Africa is larger in both land area and population than Europe and the United States combined. Black Africa is a population of greater linguistic [0], religious [1], cultural [2], and genetic [3] diversity than the white populations of Europe or the US. To the extent that a unified black identity exists, a unified white identity most exist also. Inventing one demonym to cover all black peoples of Africa and America, but not one that covers white Americans and/or Europeans, is not a decision based on history or evidence. It is purely an ideological decision, made through a uniquely American lens. [0] https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Science-Notebook/2015/0421/Why-does-Africa-have-so-many-languages https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Science-Notebook/2015/0421... "With more than 2,000 distinct languages, Africa has a third of the world's languages with less than a seventh of the world's population. By comparison, Europe, which has about an eighth of the world's population, has only about 300 languages." [1] https://www.pewforum.org/2014/04/04/global-religious-diversity/ https://www.pewforum.org/2014/04/04/global-religious-diversi... "12 countries have a very high degree of religious diversity. Six of the 12 are in the Asia-Pacific region; five are in sub-Saharan Africa; and one is in Latin America and the Caribbean. No countries in Europe, North America or the Middle East-North Africa region have a very high degree of religious diversity as measured in this study." [2] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/18/the-most-and-least-culturally-diverse-countries-in-the-world/ https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/18/the-most-an... "The usual suspects lead the list of culturally diverse countries: Chad, Cameroon, Nigeria, Togo and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These and other African countries typically rank high on any diversity index because of their multitude of tribal groups and languages. The only western country to break into the top 20 most diverse is Canada." [3] https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30318291 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30318291 "Until now, most studies examining genetic risk factors for disease have focused on Europe. Little has been known about Africa, the most genetically diverse region in the world."