3 ms·
I'm somewhat like the OP, but my intentions were nothing like his. I got rid of 95% of my stuff, not because it was distracting, but because I never used most
by ISeemToBeAVerb 15y ago
I'm somewhat like the OP, but my intentions were nothing like his.
I got rid of 95% of my stuff, not because it was distracting, but because I never used most of it. I also move a lot and I hate lugging inessentials around from place to place.
To this day, I can basically live out of a duffel bag (minus my desktop computer and guitar). I like to travel a lot, so that works for me. Is it right for everyone? Absolutely not.
One commenter pointed out below that after getting rid of everything he felt "uninteresting". I can relate to that because that's exactly how I felt when I got rid of most of my stuff. However, I now believe the opposite to be true. Personally, I put a lot of who I was into all the cool toys and records I had amassed, but when that is gone, either due to intention or accident (such as a fire), what are you left with? A big gaping hole, that's what. Filling that hole can be difficult, but I've found it to be a very rewarding experience for my own personal growth.
In the end, I kept the things that allow me to create and ditched most of the things I simply consumed. I'm not at all anti-owning-stuff, I just believe that if I buy something it needs to be something I'll use over and over again.
Really, how much you want to own is nothing more than a personal choice based on how you want to live your life and where you want to allocate your resources.
Not that controversial a topic in my opinion.