seems comparable to LG Puricare ($289), https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-lg-puricare-mask.html https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-lg-puricare-mask.html and

seems comparable to LG Puricare ($289), https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-lg-puricare-mask.html https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-lg-puricare-mask.html and Philips Fresh Air Mask ($189), https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-philips-mask.html https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-philips-mask.html https://www.philips.com/a-w/about/dutch-design-week-2020/philips-fresh-air-mask.html https://www.philips.com/a-w/about/dutch-design-week-2020/phi... and Purely ($79) https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-purely.html https://www.shopmask.com/respirator-purely.html unfortunately despite being even slightly more expensive than LG Puricare, it seems to have worse filters? not sure why you would want to tie your music listening to your air purification? people who traditionally might like this type of consumer grade active filter mask are those worried about the effects of pollution in cities on their health, it's interesting to see this company xupermask attempt to appeal instead to streetwear or fashion and music crowds. I predict a very small chance of actually breaking through and making this type of mask more widely popular outside health-focused or urban foot+cycle commuters and a large chance of complete failure due to the product's price and lack of consumer interest. people immediately dismissing this are just ignorant to the real interest in air filtration by those who are deeply concerned with the health effects of breathing urban pollution.