> My perspective is that our technological advancement has well outpaced our ability to adapt to the changes or bring our legal and social tools effectively to

> My perspective is that our technological advancement has well outpaced our ability to adapt to the changes or bring our legal and social tools effectively to bear on them. > A decade or two of stagnation would be frustrating for those in the field but probably overall a good thing. Plus I don't think this would affect research at all so not even. I agree. And frankly, technological "progress" for its own sake reeks of technopoly [1]. Technology should serve society, not the other way around. [1] A term coined in a very good book by Neil Postman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technopoly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technopoly: > Postman defines technopoly as a "totalitarian technocracy", which demands the "submission of all forms of cultural life to the sovereignty of technique and technology".