3 ms·
You are assuming a huge amount about how universes are generated, a process about which we know basically nothing.
by ahelwer 6y ago
You are assuming a huge amount about how universes are generated, a process about which we know basically nothing.
- coliveira 6y agoQuite the opposite, I'm assuming very little. That's the whole idea of searching for simple universal laws.
- tsimionescu 6y agoNo, you are assuming that simpler things are more likely to appear out of nothing than complex things. There is no basis for this assumption outside the laws of physics themselves. In fact, in mathematics, the opposite is usually true - there are many more complex objects than simple ones, so given a random object, you should expect it to be complex rather than simple. For example, given a real number, it is infinitely more likely that it will be irrational rather than natural.