3 ms·
1. Incorrect. a) Not everyone - a lot of people oppose Putin. https://echo.msk.ru https://echo.msk.ru, https://novayagazeta.ru https://novayagazeta.ru Most con
by shashurup 6y ago
1. Incorrect.
a) Not everyone - a lot of people oppose Putin. https://echo.msk.ru https://echo.msk.ru, https://novayagazeta.ru https://novayagazeta.ru Most content on these sites devoted to critisizing Putin and current regime. These people do this for years.
b) Not everyone from your list opposed Putin, for instnace Khlebnikov mostly concentrated on Beresovsky.
2. Correct. We don't have any official evidence. This means that the only thing we can do is to analyze what is available. The links you provided don't help much in this endevour.
- croon 6y agoIn science, you don't need to explain how/why something happens, only reproduce and prove THAT something happens. We know that people die or are jailed. We can definitely see patterns that group those people together. Everything points to a single explanation, but regardless if that is proved or not, the effects are black on white. I don't have to understand/prove weak forces or gravity to state that 100 of 100 apples dropped fall to the ground.
- shashurup 6y agoIn science we create theories which come form hypotheses. Theories need to be proved. Facts may support, oppose, prove or disprove a hypothesis, this is not at all black or white. Facts are black or white regardles of sience. Black and white facts are the person murdered, crime commited and some other person guilty. The hypothesis is who this other person is. The fact that the person murdered is not the most dangerous for the person suspected support the hypothesis that this has been done to discredit him. (but doesn't prove or disprove the hypothesis). The fact that nobody has been prosecuted supports the hypothesis that the suspect is guilty.