4 ms·

> I won't indulge what kind There's only one kind considered too controversial for mainstream.

JeremyBanks 6y ago
Coordination of armed insurrection against the United States? Accusations of Democratic pedophile rings to distract from the known Republican pedophiles in Congress? Lies about the election rigging to justify overtly racist voter suppression?
- ralusek 6y ago
  Depends on who's doing it. > Coordination of armed insurrection against the United States? Coordinating burning down Minneapolis police station is okay. Bombing Portland Federal Courthouse is okay. I'm afraid you haven't quite captured it yet, but close. > Lies about the election rigging to justify overtly racist voter suppression? No, speaking for 4 years about Russian collusion rigging the election was allowed on mainstream platforms. I'm afraid you'll still need to be more specific.
marricks 6y ago
I mean, this comment could give you some clues [to what their leanings are and what content could be hosted*]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26610522 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26610522 *Added context since parent was flagged
- stirfish 6y ago
  >For all I've seen "non-white non-male" is generally given priority in all kinds of areas, certainly in start-up interest. It's considered "hip" to associate with these "non-white non-male" groups, irregardless of their actual performance in whatever area they were prioritized. (To a certain extent at least, they can't be completely nonperforming) Being able to show that you have included these groups in whatever way your organization works, gives you advantages in press situations foremost, but also in other ways such as meeting arbitrary quotas set by higher-ups and HR dept.s in your organization. I'm guessing...videos leaked from inside factory farms.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  - goodpoint 6y ago
    Guess again: > 1) Non-white non-males are given less ability to grow in the "STEM/Entrepreneurship" fields as students and/or children by society. > 2) White men are able to outperform those other groups by some inherent quality. > Nevertheless, 1) seems to be partially disproved Unless I misread, the claim that is being made here is "white males are inherently superior"
    - marricks 6y ago
      That was my take! I think stirfish was being sarcastic about factory farms and probably reached the same (scary) conclusion.
    - raarts 6y ago
      To me it's more likely due to not being able to see reality is more nuanced than 2 options.
anoncake 6y ago
Conservative-Libertarian Anarcho-Marxist Fascism?
- marricks 6y ago
  The only true popular front! /s
  - extradesgo 6y ago
    If you’re intending to be sarcastic, you probably mean united front.
    - marricks 6y ago
      Looking at the definition I see united front actually fits the idea better! I did mean to be sarcastic and wrong though.
      - extradesgo 6y ago
        Ha! Blending of conflicting ideologies implies compromise or trade-off, which would be a popular front. In a united front, the groups do not merge or compromise. Ideologies and ultimate intentions remain pure, and the groups only collaborate in the name of overlapping interests.
- varispeed 6y ago
  These days as long as you promise financial benefits for about 10-30% of population, anything goes. That's why you've got so many populist parties around Europe winning elections. People don't care much as long as they get paid, can buy food, pay rent, and spend rest of the day browsing internet or getting drunk in front of Netflix.
raarts 6y ago
Which one are you referring to? Because I can think of a few.
zaptidizap 6y ago
You would be surpriced
keithnz 6y ago
if you look through his twitter, you can see the kinds of things he promotes....

Coordination of armed insurrection against the United States? Accusations of Democratic pedophile rings to distract from the known Republican pedophiles in Congress? Lies about the election rigging to justify overtly racist voter suppression?

ralusek 6y ago
Depends on who's doing it. > Coordination of armed insurrection against the United States? Coordinating burning down Minneapolis police station is okay. Bombing Portland Federal Courthouse is okay. I'm afraid you haven't quite captured it yet, but close. > Lies about the election rigging to justify overtly racist voter suppression? No, speaking for 4 years about Russian collusion rigging the election was allowed on mainstream platforms. I'm afraid you'll still need to be more specific.

marricks 6y ago

I mean, this comment could give you some clues [to what their leanings are and what content could be hosted*]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26610522 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26610522 *Added context since parent was flagged

stirfish 6y ago
>For all I've seen "non-white non-male" is generally given priority in all kinds of areas, certainly in start-up interest. It's considered "hip" to associate with these "non-white non-male" groups, irregardless of their actual performance in whatever area they were prioritized. (To a certain extent at least, they can't be completely nonperforming) Being able to show that you have included these groups in whatever way your organization works, gives you advantages in press situations foremost, but also in other ways such as meeting arbitrary quotas set by higher-ups and HR dept.s in your organization. I'm guessing...videos leaked from inside factory farms.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- goodpoint 6y ago
  Guess again: > 1) Non-white non-males are given less ability to grow in the "STEM/Entrepreneurship" fields as students and/or children by society. > 2) White men are able to outperform those other groups by some inherent quality. > Nevertheless, 1) seems to be partially disproved Unless I misread, the claim that is being made here is "white males are inherently superior"
  - marricks 6y ago
    That was my take! I think stirfish was being sarcastic about factory farms and probably reached the same (scary) conclusion.
  - raarts 6y ago
    To me it's more likely due to not being able to see reality is more nuanced than 2 options.

anoncake 6y ago

Conservative-Libertarian Anarcho-Marxist Fascism?

marricks 6y ago
The only true popular front! /s
- extradesgo 6y ago
  If you’re intending to be sarcastic, you probably mean united front.
  - marricks 6y ago
    Looking at the definition I see united front actually fits the idea better! I did mean to be sarcastic and wrong though.
    - extradesgo 6y ago
      Ha! Blending of conflicting ideologies implies compromise or trade-off, which would be a popular front. In a united front, the groups do not merge or compromise. Ideologies and ultimate intentions remain pure, and the groups only collaborate in the name of overlapping interests.
varispeed 6y ago
These days as long as you promise financial benefits for about 10-30% of population, anything goes. That's why you've got so many populist parties around Europe winning elections. People don't care much as long as they get paid, can buy food, pay rent, and spend rest of the day browsing internet or getting drunk in front of Netflix.

raarts 6y ago

Which one are you referring to? Because I can think of a few.

zaptidizap 6y ago

You would be surpriced

keithnz 6y ago

if you look through his twitter, you can see the kinds of things he promotes....