3 ms·
> I disagree that blasphemy was to serve the greater good. It was justified on that ground. That doesn't mean there was no ulterior motive.
by MikeUt 5y ago
> I disagree that blasphemy was to serve the greater good.
It was justified on that ground. That doesn't mean there was no ulterior motive.
- tweetle_beetle 5y agoAgreed. That's more or less the basis of what I have said in all my comments in this thread. Maybe adding the word "designed" or "intended" into my comment would have made that clearer. But this doesn't respond to the main point I was trying to make - this new law is not just a "switch from one god to another".