4 ms·
It can't be a human right. There are less IPV4 addresses than there are humans.
by Apreche 6y ago
It can't be a human right. There are less IPV4 addresses than there are humans.
- briffle 6y agoFunny thing is, the article said nothing about IPv4, and doesn't mention IPv6 at all...
- u801e 6y agoAren't there ISPs that provide IPv6 addresses for consumer accounts?
- nemetroid 6y agoYes. My ISP hands out a /64, which RIPE apparently considers best practice: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690#4-1-1---64-prefix-from-a-dedicated-pool-of-ipv6-prefixes https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690#4-1-1---64-p...
- akvadrako 6y agoThat's for the WAN Link - the network between your router and the ISP's infrastructure. For your local networks RIPE recommends ISPs assign each end user a /48 or /56: > However, /64 is not sustainable, it doesn't allow customer subnetting, and it doesn't follow IETF recommendations of “at least” multiple /64s per customer.
- roblabla 6y agoand more ipv6 than there are atoms in the universe.
- p1mrx 6y ago10^38 < 10^80 (and that's just the observable universe)