4 ms·
> Are people already forgetting how masks were actively disrecommended by 'professionals' at the start of the pandemic while plenty here and in other places wer
by AndrewUnmuted 5y ago
> Are people already forgetting how masks were actively disrecommended by 'professionals' at the start of the pandemic while plenty here and in other places were similarly saying that masks are obviously good?
We are talking about science, I thought. Phrases like "obviously good," really are not in the scientific spirit.
Professionals also said that double-masking is even more obviously, obviously good. But that obvious obviousness was, quite obviously, wrong. [0]
[0] https://dossier.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-double-mask-mannequin-study https://dossier.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-double-mask-mannequi...
- rhn_mk1 5y agoNothing in the article states that double masking is not good. It merely states that the study doesn't give any reliable conclusions.
- SiempreViernes 5y agoAre you saying it's obviously good, but you can't tell it helps?
- Tenoke 5y agoAs far as I can tell nobody but you is using the phrase 'obviously good' for that particular claim and is simply the case of a specific study being touted and then turning out it has flaws which does happen all the time and isn't what we were talking about.