2 ms·
It does not require more ram than ext4 in the configurations that DSM provides.
by brnt 6y ago
It does not require more ram than ext4 in the configurations that DSM provides.
- op00to 6y agoSource? How about cpu capabilities? Were they tested?
- brnt 6y agoYou're making the claim ;) The main thing an fs is, is a layout for data on disk after all, no mainline fs will do this in a way that is particularly consumptive of resources. Specific features like RAID and deduplication are known to add to RAM and CPU requirements. Synology uses BTRFS for neither, so any performance differences are almost certainly not due to the specific fs. I also have not seen any evidence of perf diffs.