4 ms·
The title is perfectly fine or at least "good enough". HN is not like Stackoverflow with its persnickety rules. This topic generated some discussion including
by crispyambulance 6y ago
The title is perfectly fine or at least "good enough".
HN is not like Stackoverflow with its persnickety rules. This topic generated some discussion including those who feel the title is not suitable. That's a success.
Ironic to me that the ones objecting to the title say they value the time wasted to "click" but then write sentences explaining why that time was wasted. So x seconds to click and figure out you don't like the title and then 10x seconds to write a critique? Maybe just ignore it next time and move on with life?
- Aachen 6y ago> ignore it next time and move on with life? You're making it sound as if this is about a single person clicking a single link and skimming until they find the necessary context (say, 15 seconds) to judge whether they want to continue reading, versus debating a topic in a subthread (minutes). Obviously, the actual point is that everyone needs to click many links whenever they visit HN and is continously sinking that time for as many useless titles as are being posted or as they can be bothered to click through on. (If needing to click to find out what it's about is fine, we should browse HN with only the stories' rank and no title at all.) We could instead choose to not religiously stick to applying a guideline on using the original title. After all, I would also like: > HN [to not be] like Stackoverflow with its persnickety rules.
- skinnymuch 6y agoBut if HN sticks hard to the original title rule. How is it not persnickety?