5 ms·

I have not decided, whether reading your comment was worth its time, so maybe explain what you mean?

• code-is-code 6y ago
  He is right. Implying that Webassembly is strongly typed is garbage and tells much about the rest of the content.
  • hutzlibu 6y ago
    Why is that garbage? Is this maybe something with academic definition of strongly typed? Because the way I understand Webassembly, it surely is strongly typed. edit: "Strongly typed is a concept used to refer to a programming language that enforces strict restrictions on intermixing of values with differing data types." https://www.techopedia.com/definition/24434/strongly-typed https://www.techopedia.com/definition/24434/strongly-typed Seems to back me up.
  • rickbutton 6y ago
    this is nonsense. WebAssembly is strongly typed. either you don't understand type systems, or you don't understand WebAssembly. in either case, I can encourage reading the article, because it sheds some light on both topics!