3 ms·
They banned wallstreetbets to get out of the firing line before the senate hearing. It was weak, but I don't think it was motivated by anything approaching a m
by wyattpeak 6y ago
They banned wallstreetbets to get out of the firing line before the senate hearing.
It was weak, but I don't think it was motivated by anything approaching a moral imperative, it seemed entirely pragmatic.
- adamcstephens 6y agoThis. Banning to satisfy the party in power is now the new normal.