3 ms·
>dismissed the idea that strong winds had pushed the ship off course. >Rabie did not cite any evidence or say how he arrived at that conclusion. Shouldn't the
by sthnblllII 6y ago
>dismissed the idea that strong winds had pushed the ship off course.
>Rabie did not cite any evidence or say how he arrived at that conclusion.
Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the ship owners to show that they did everything to prevent the accident? Its like saying "He may have smashed his car into your house, but have you proved that the road was not extremely icey?" No, but the guy who smashed his car into my house should have to prove it was. I shouldnt have to prove it wasnt. He is the one responsible for his vehicle.
- zaphirplane 6y agoThe complications is the presence of local mandatory pilots on the ship with your analogy, you are in the car navigating when it happened You say the driver is responsible the driver says the navigator stuffed up
- sthnblllII 6y agoWhen did the ship owner accuse the pilots of causing the accident? That wasn't mentioned in the article, and it doesn't change who is ultimately responsible for the ship.