4 ms·
I agree with you its quality but what i'm saying is that didn't matter. And to counter on the browser bit, Rust/Go/C/etc can be compiled into Webassembly and y
by neximo64 6y ago
I agree with you its quality but what i'm saying is that didn't matter.
And to counter on the browser bit, Rust/Go/C/etc can be compiled into Webassembly and yet its not thriving. Similarly on the backends Javascript is thriving too.
- int_19h 6y agowasm is still a very niche thing in terms of scenarios that it can cover. Things will be very different once there's a full-fledged native wasm browser API that is at least equivalent in power to what JS gets today. On the backends, it seems that the only reason why JS even made a foothold there is because it was on the front-end first, and because it had its performance optimized there (V8 etc) first. Node specifically pitched "same language for both front-end and back-end" back in the day. JS is kind of like C - it just has an immense first mover advantage by now, to the point where it's very hard to move forward from it. I hope wasm will be the holy grail in that regard... eventually.