3 ms·
The site’s guiding principle is “intellectual curiosity”. That’s why Dang “singles out” your comment (which he’s not really doing, he often pulls people up for
by tomhoward 6y ago
The site’s guiding principle is “intellectual curiosity”. That’s why Dang “singles out” your comment (which he’s not really doing, he often pulls people up for off-topic rage commenting).
> But the same applies to many, many other discussions on HN
You’re conflating your style of comment with posted articles, where the author explores a topic, discusses it in depth and proposes a solution. And sure, sometimes those kinds of articles convey some anger or stir some in the reader. But they still have to gratify intellectual curiosity to be considered good HN content.
Why don’t you try writing an article like that?
- anyfoo 6y agoIt wasn't my comment, it was someone else's comment. I just disagree with this decision in particular, for the stated reasons, which also elaborate on why I think this would have been a valuable topic of discussion. dang can choose to incorporate that (e.g. if indication is that others feel the same), or ignore it.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]