This so called climate emergency isn’t a falsifiable theory. So why is an apparent science journal committing to it? We know putting carbon in the air has an i

This so called climate emergency isn’t a falsifiable theory. So why is an apparent science journal committing to it? We know putting carbon in the air has an inverse square relation to temperature increases. We can prove this. So why not focus on the actual science instead of debasing yourself further? (2+2 can equal 5 was a recent position this journal took) Do actual science, please.