3 ms·
That description describes both parties. Each denies inconvenient science and blocks progress. Literally the only reason I know which party you're talking about
by seriousquestion 6y ago
That description describes both parties. Each denies inconvenient science and blocks progress. Literally the only reason I know which party you're talking about is because of the context of this thread.
- kergonath 6y agoStupidity transcends parties. I have no dog in your fight, and I would not be voting for democrats if they were politicians where I live. That said, despite all the new new age stupidity and antivaxx misinformation from some liberals, only one party has a platform that is obviously anti-science. I wonder what kind of inconvenient science you have in mind that democrats are supposed to ignore.
- andrenth 6y agoBiology.
- kergonath 6y agoYou mean, like evolution, epidemiology, vaccines and stuff? If you think about the gender thing, this is a social ideology. Biology is irrelevant to which bathroom someone can use.
- andrenth 6y agoTell that to women getting their skull crushed by biological men in female sports.
- kergonath 6y agoBiology does not say anything about how we create categories for athletes either... Separating men from women is arbitrary, and we could very well use other criteria (weight, height, or whatever). Choosing to separate genders instead of sexes is a political decision; you are conflating social and scientific issues. Also, citation needed.