4 ms·
In australia for example, where there is currently zero community transmission, and AZ was the preferred rollout for most of the population, assuming only women
by robbiep 6y ago
In australia for example, where there is currently zero community transmission, and AZ was the preferred rollout for most of the population, assuming only women are vulnerable (not true) about 8m women below 50 (the age for which the government instituted the cutoff for alternatives) so at 1:500,000 risk of some injury (edit - originally said death) that’s 16 people who, ceteris paribus, wouldn’t be at any risk
- fspeech 6y agoI think your argument can be better if you qualify your assessment of risk for Australian women with the temporal constraint of "for now". Because transmission is low in Australia they may be better off waiting for a safer choice. However eventually travel will return and it is highly likely that the virus will still be around.
- robbiep 6y agoYou mean, like 'ceteris paribus'?