3 ms·
The community kind of enforced its own standards (eg almost no jokes, especially no stupid Reddit-style joke threads). But I think moderation was more importan
by dan-robertson 6y ago
The community kind of enforced its own standards (eg almost no jokes, especially no stupid Reddit-style joke threads).
But I think moderation was more important. However much pg wrote about being curious or “intellectual honesty” or whatever, it was the change in moderation (to dang) that saw changes. But that sort of thing doesn’t fit all communities.
For one thing this one is basically public (there’s no shared-private things like subgroups or DMs) and tends to have reasonably highly educated members. For another, the volume is low enough that dang can deal with it all with only some automated tools, giving a reasonably consistent approach to moderation. Also I think he is paid much more like a software engineer in Silicon Valley than a typical social media moderator.
There are certainly some other more general things though, like the anti-flame mechanisms, the lack of more inflammatory media like pictures or videos, the lack of printed comment score and downvote limits, and the generally public moderation trail (though moderator may privately email users too).
- dec0dedab0de 6y agoI agree, I meant that dang and sctb have a style that is more about nudging people into better behavior than about demanding compliance.
- ddingus 6y agoDoing that is worth a lot! Many will see something like that and give it thought. If they do, that is halfway there, maybe more.
- p1necone 6y agoI'm learning to just downvote and not respond to troll bait, slowly. And I got my upvote points past the point where I can set the color of the title bar so I don't care about those any more which helps.