3 ms·
This is somewhat ironic given the recent interview Tim Cook did with Kara Swisher on Sway[1] that touched on topics like App Store curation and not allowing sid
by spondyl 6y ago
This is somewhat ironic given the recent interview Tim Cook did with Kara Swisher on Sway[1] that touched on topics like App Store curation and not allowing side loading.
Here's an excerpt:
> Kara Swisher: Like Netflix and others, right. What’s wrong with Epic or any developer going their own way or allowing a direct payment system, instead of having to go through the App Store? Why should you have the control?
> Tim Cook: Well, I think somebody has to. I think somebody has to curate, right? Because users aren’t going to come there and buy things if they don’t have trust and confidence in the store. And we think our users want that.
> Kara Swisher: Why can’t there be more stores, other stores run by others?
> Tim Cook: Because if you had side loading, you would break the privacy and security model.
> Kara Swisher: On the phone itself, and the phone itself wouldn’t protect the user necessarily.
> Tim Cook: Well, you’d be opening up a huge vector on another store.
> [a minute or so later]
> Tim Cook: I think curation is important as a part of the App Store. In any given week, 100,000 applications come into the app review. 40,000 of them are rejected. Most of them are rejected because they don’t work or don’t work like they say that they work. You can imagine if curation went away, what would occur to the App Store in a very short amount of time.
---
I agree that not having sideloading, without giving it any thought on the technical implentation, is probably safer in terms of reducing "viruses" and what not.
It's arguable that cases like families whose kids spends tens of thousands due to dark patterns in approved applications were no safer than if they had run a side loaded application or a vetted one though.
Similarly, I can only imagine the amount of money wasted on misleadingly titled applications.
You could perhaps argue that the privacy model is compromised anyway in the sense that you can install Facebook, sign up and have your info dumped online, through no fault of Apple. The upcoming ATT changes should help but they haven't existed since, well, the app store was created :)
[1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/05/opinion/apples-ceo-is-making-very-different-choices-from-mark-zuckerberg.html?showTranscript=1 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/05/opinion/apples-ceo-is-mak...
- orangecat 6y agoTim Cook: Because if you had side loading, you would break the privacy and security model. I really wish somebody would follow up a response like that by asking if that means macOS is inherently insecure and dangerous.