4 ms·
>lauded mainly by professors who can’t stand that their student’s attention can’t be held captive by their awful soapboxing I spent five years as a university
by eszed 6y ago
>lauded mainly by professors who can’t stand that their student’s attention can’t be held captive by their awful soapboxing
I spent five years as a university professor, and I did not care at all whether my students were taking notes on their laptops, or trying to multi-task by studying for something else (or even checking their Facebook, or whatever). I know I did the same (studying, not Facebooking; I'm too old for that) when I was a student, and I'd rather have had them in class, no matter where their cost-benefit analysis directed their moment-by-moment attention.
If it was a discussion-oriented class, then we arranged chairs in a circle; I sat (very non-hierarchically, lol) in the same circle. No problem there.
If it was a more "conventional" classroom setup, then I always asked the laptop-users to sit in the back. This was because I'd observed (our department had us sit in, once per term, on a colleague's class, which was excellent) that students frequently viewed distracting material in class. I don't know which was worse: the dude looking through photos of his girlfriend not-quite-nude, but definitely NSFW; or the girl reviewing for an A&P test, and flipping through really gory human dissection photos. No one needs to see those.
I always explained the reason to my students, with those exact examples, and no one ever had a problem -- though I remember sometimes seeing a few red faces on the first day as the laptop-users switched seats.
You're totally right, though, about adults making their own decisions about knowledge processing. I always tried to respect students' autonomy to the greatest extent possible. I saw my laptop rule as an important part of that ethos.
- jdgoesmarching 6y agoThese are completely fair compromises and I wish this attitude was more widespread. The discussion example in particular is why I bring up variability in teaching methods. In that setting, jotting down some occasional ideas is all you might need. Compare that to one of my former professors who quizzed us on his personal anecdotes from lecture and we have a complete different set of needs. These studies annoy me because they insist that lectures are identical and “comprehension” is always poorly defined as some arbitrary exam of how many obscure details were memorized from a Powerpoint. At the end of the day, whether I’m transcribing on a laptop or visually representing ideas with watercolors is less important than how effectively a teacher happens to target my learning style. At some point we need to stop repackaging the Prussian model and insisting on the One True Way™ for students to learn.