3 ms·
It could be that apple places a greater premium on thinness and that position just so happens to have as a byproduct early obsolescence and better profits. But
by jasonfarnon 6y ago
It could be that apple places a greater premium on thinness and that position just so happens to have as a byproduct early obsolescence and better profits. But I don't see why that's any more plausible than what you call conspiracy theories.
- antattack 6y agoPlanned obsolescence is not a conspiracy - it's a business decision.
- simonh 6y agoFrom the company with industry leading support periods, device lifetimes and second hand value retention. If their intention is to deprecate devices early, they're objectively doing an incredibly terrible job at it.
- antattack 6y agoDurability and cost are usually polar opposites. I suppose planned obsolescence is not the best term to describe it however engineers do certainly factor in product lifetime (as much as they can) into their designs.
- Toutouxc 6y agoI'm looking at my GF, she's on the couch, watching an online uni lecture and writing Markdown on my 7yo MacBook Pro. Original battery, updated from Mavericks all the way to Big Sur. Runs fine, a few hours of battery life. My dad has a 2014 Mac Mini, currently on Catalina, runs fine. My sister's BF also has MacBook Pro that he's been abusing for the last six years. His battery is almost dead, but the machine itself runs fine. My ex-GF is still rocking her iPad Mini (the first retina model) that she bought in 2014. She loves the thing and the thing loves her back. If Apple is in the business of early or planned obsolescence, they're fucking terrible at it.