3 ms·
What you describe seems to be term called "relative poverty" which is contrastable with "absolute poverty", which I just learned about recently. What I read re
by ElijahLynn 6y ago
What you describe seems to be term called "relative poverty" which is contrastable with "absolute poverty", which I just learned about recently.
What I read recently made the case for "relative poverty" being more psychologically damaging than "absolute poverty". e.g. if everyone one in your society is the same poor then it isn't as bad as being poor in a society of wealth. This made a lot of sense to me as I tasted relative poverty a few times, and there seemed to be a feeling of shame around it. Not that anyone tried to shame the (relatively) poor but it just felt shameful. I never wanted to invite my millionaire family classmates over to my tiny, run down house for example, as it was too embarrassing. I eventually moved back to a place where we had similar levels of income and there was only a single millionaire and it felt a lot better.