3 ms·
"they wouldn't have simply walked away from the deal regulating it." The deal did not 'regulate' Iran - is the argument being made. Many people feel that the
by jariel 5y ago
"they wouldn't have simply walked away from the deal regulating it."
The deal did not 'regulate' Iran - is the argument being made.
Many people feel that the oversight requirements were not stringent enough, and that Iran would effectively pursue nukes along with economic liberalism.
- newacct583 5y ago> Many people feel that the oversight requirements were not stringent enough This might be true! But it was replaced with a situation where there are no requirements at all. And here we are. If you have a better policy idea you need to implement the better policy and not just take your toys and go home.
- shagmin 5y agoThis is my understanding as well, although I disagree with it. I know I'm not the first one questioning if sanctions even work most of the time, or if an economically crippled country is better for the long term health in a region known for its extremists versus one where its economy is not held back in any antagonistic manner, even if it has a nuke.