The only valid point of contention here is the demanding removal of her name on the paper. My game theory'ish take on the demands. Gebru 1.The demands were r

The only valid point of contention here is the demanding removal of her name on the paper. My game theory'ish take on the demands. Gebru 1.The demands were reasonable so she herself should have no issue sharing them. Vindicates her position against Google and proves herself and her theories correct, scoring a huge victory for her AI research. 2.Even she know her demands were so ridiculous she is not comfortable sharing them. Option one has not happened so that leaves two. Google really has no good outcome in sharing them it could be considered all variety of violations HR so they likely never will without her permission.