> "we refuse to take responsibility ourselves" I'm to be responsible for what someone else's views are? Nonsense. This is the cry of the censorship apologist.

> "we refuse to take responsibility ourselves" I'm to be responsible for what someone else's views are? Nonsense. This is the cry of the censorship apologist. This moderation draft you speak of... what guidelines will the draftees follow? Will they moderate out of the goodness of their hearts? Or will they follow some standard? (I'm sure many people would be extremely eager to author! You mean I get to decide what is permissible to discuss online? What a wonderful avenue to advance my political causes by force!) The author is right. The solution is not to double down on moderation.