5 ms·
I would argue that git blame is prominent enough. And as long as you don't distribute sources in any other way than a git repo you are fine.
by frant-hartm 6y ago
I would argue that git blame is prominent enough. And as long as you don't distribute sources in any other way than a git repo you are fine.
- Benjamin_Dobell 6y agoAssuming this is true (hopefully it never comes down to it, but I'll leave that for the courts), then the simple act of hosting on Github, with its download source functionality, would make you in violation.
- atq2119 6y agoYou can argue all you want, ultimately it's for courts to decide, and in the meantime the Apache 2 license creates a ton of legal uncertainty for no good reason. For example, GPL has language requiring you to make clear that you changed the software, but leaves open how you do it, and doesn't require you to mark individual files.