3 ms·
No, nor MIT/X11. There is debate as to whether its wording might provide some protection through accident of history, but that's not how the law should work: a
by SeanLuke 6y ago
No, nor MIT/X11. There is debate as to whether its wording might provide some protection through accident of history, but that's not how the law should work: a proper license is unambiguous.
- xxpor 6y agoIn common law countries, it's nearly impossible to write a legal document that's completely unambiguous. Even if it's unambiguous at the time the document is written, the underlying law could change at any time. Of course that could happen in civil law countries too, but it'd be from a statute being changed.
- SeanLuke 6y agoWhataboutism. There's a massive difference between "no license is 100% unambiguous" and "BSD is maximally ambiguous".