4 ms·
This is an excellent way of putting it. Also please understand that as employers we make people do this silly dance because it's the best way we, and frankly a
by Kranar 6y ago
This is an excellent way of putting it.
Also please understand that as employers we make people do this silly dance because it's the best way we, and frankly anyone, knows to reduce the risk of hiring high quality candidates.
I can understand the frustration of doing the silly dance for companies that don't pay competitively and think they are at the same level as Google minus the pay... but for companies paying among the top 5%, we get flooded and flooded with resumes and while you may be a good person, present yourself nicely (and those are all good things to do), and even impress with a resume, it's simply too risky to hire you on that basis without seeing a demonstration of your technical abilities.
When I started out I really was dead-set against hiring people based on the silly dance... after making a lot of bad hires and seeing people who looked impressive on paper but couldn't apply some basic algorithmic knowledge to solve some problems I succumbed to using the silly dance and honestly the quality of candidates I hired improved substantially.
- worker767424 6y agoLearning and reciting the silly dance is at least plausibly correlated with job performance, hence fizzbuzz.
- opportune 6y agoAlso as an interviewer, you notice things beyond just the dance. I and other interviewers I know have not passed people with mostly-correct answers due to things like being rude/condescending or other poor communication skills. One thing the “dance” does is show what someone is like in a difficult problem solving situation and how they respond to it. Is the stress a confounding variable? Yes, for sure. It’s an imperfect solution to a hard problem