4 ms·
If this were the case it would be odd that this is happening a.) in a consistent subset of women 18-38 b.) that it would emerge in a 1-shot regimen rather than
by JediWing 5y ago
If this were the case it would be odd that this is happening a.) in a consistent subset of women 18-38
b.) that it would emerge in a 1-shot regimen rather than a 2-shot regimen, because it would seem more likely that any one individual would experience this more frequently with 2 chances for human error rather than 1
- UncleOxidant 5y agoThe Pfizer & Moderna 2-shot vaccines use mRNA instead of an adenovirus vector. The AZ vaccine is 2 shot, but also uses a similar adenovirus vector - the bloodclot issue has also been seen in the AZ vaccine which has led to some countries in Europe not allowing it for women under 60.
- JediWing 5y agoI would assume the guidelines for aspirating would be the same across all of these vaccines, though? If so the original point still stands regardless of adenovirus vs. mRNA
- wholinator2 5y agoYes, we know that. But what does adenovirus vs mRNA have to do with aspirating an injection? Does the adenovirus become more dangerous when accidentally placed in a blood vessel?
- stjohnswarts 5y agowith only 6 people you can't really say that since it's such a tiny sample size. If it's 6 women then you're starting to get to a pattern worth testing.