4 ms·
That’s incredibly wasteful of him and unscientific.
by Google234 6y ago
That’s incredibly wasteful of him and unscientific.
- vcxy 6y agoWasteful of his employer, not him.
- Godel_unicode 6y agoIt's not like they're forcing him to do it. He could just say "no"...
- GavinMcG 6y agoIn many states there wouldn't necessarily be any protection from losing his job, if he did.
- nrmitchi 6y agoLet me explain how that would play out. ``` Employer: We want you to take an extra and unnecessary vaccine dose, which you, as an RN, likely understand to be most-likely useless. Employee: That's useless and unnecessary. No, I won't take it. Employer: You're fired. ``` What kind of magical world do you think people live in where their employer doesn't hold a stupid amount of power over them?
- Beaver117 6y agoWhat kind of world do you live where (high skilled/paid) people get fired over something like that?
- Balgair 6y agoDepending on the employment contract, vaccinations of any kind may be required as a condition of employment. This is common for public school. I do not know any of the specifics of OP's situation, but it does sound reasonable.
- fireeyed 6y agoTrial lawyers are salivating over all kinds of constitutional and civil rights infringement. I can't wait to see them go to town on the woke employers mandating experimental vaccines on the sheep.
- numpad0 6y agoDisservice to the society at large but unscientific? Isn’t it going to very marginally improve effectiveness, like from 95% to 95.5%?
- Wistar 5y agoWell, I am skeptical. It's why I asked (and apparently pissed off some down-voting-inclined people by asking).