3 ms·
When he said "evidence-based," he's referring to statistically recorded rates of recidivism. You are correct, NA and AA are primarily social clubs, and there's
by Eric_WVGG 6y ago
When he said "evidence-based," he's referring to statistically recorded rates of recidivism.
You are correct, NA and AA are primarily social clubs, and there's no harm in that. But if the point is to recover from addiction, keep looking.
- sn_master 6y agorecidivism rates are applicable to rehab centers which offer multi-week in-patient programs. they're all legally required to provide them, and most are pretty sad (50%+ is typical). no one claims attending a meeting with a few random people and talking is a "recovery program" by any stretch of imagination. they're completely different things.
- sneak 6y ago> no one claims attending a meeting with a few random people and talking is a "recovery program" by any stretch of imagination. they're completely different things. In my experience that is a false claim: AA/NA proponents frequently assert that they can help you recover from addiction. Their religion-based system has about the same probability of helping you recover from addiction as not going to AA/NA.
- placer 6y ago>Their religion-based system has about the same probability of helping you recover from addiction as not going to AA/NA. Not this again. We know for a fact that treatments which encourage people to be a part of AA fellowships result in a significantly higher rate of abstinence from alcohol. [1] See Ycombinator discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22545557 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22545557 This doesn’t mean AA is for everyone, but it does show that Alcoholics Anonymous is quite helpful for a significant subset of alcoholics. [1] John Kelly, et. al. “Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12‐step programs for alcohol use disorder” Cochrane 2020 PMC7065341 (open access, no paywall: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065341/ )