4 ms·
Yes, they are meaningfully different. For one, Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines, while J&J and AZ are not.
by viklove 5y ago
Yes, they are meaningfully different. For one, Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines, while J&J and AZ are not.
- Moto7451 5y agoThat’s not the difference the parent is asking about. He’s asking if the adenovirus based vaccines available are meaningfully different. Reaching beyond the parent’s words, both AstraZeneca and J&J have now had issues with blood clots. If it’s a similar formulation then perhaps you’ve found something and Adenovirus vaccines with a different formulation are unaffected. If they’re very different then perhaps other variations of Adenovirus vaccines need more attention.
- viklove 5y agoThe mechanism of delivery isn't a meaningful difference? Okay, if you just want to ignore half of the equation be my guest.
- ivalm 5y agoThey are comparing jj and astro zeneca, both use adenovirus delivery. Albeit very different variants.
- GavinMcG 5y agoThe parent comment wondered > whether Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca are meaningfully different Grammatically, that asks about the difference between J&J & AZ. Your response instead compared them collectively to the mRNA vaccines, rather than comparing them to each other. Thus the response saying "[t]hat’s not the difference the parent is asking about."