35 ms·
> It’s simple command line interface expects users will program in other languages like C or assembly. I think the point here is that DOS explicitly rejects th
by ticviking 6y ago
> It’s simple command line interface expects users will program in other languages like C or assembly.
I think the point here is that DOS explicitly rejects the composition that pipes enable, in exchange for the ability to just hand "the whole system" over to a programmer.
- mixmastamyk 6y agoDOS had pipes since version 2.0 I believe. But the main point, that DOS was basically a thin program loader that "got out of the way" is sound. Think of it like a UEFI shell environment, with 640k+ limits.
- unilynx 6y agoDos pipes were just writes and reads to temporary files. No parallel processes
- mixmastamyk 6y agoOk, but didn't concern the end user, as far as I can remember.