2 ms·
No, it's not "too dangerous", rather it's "we did not warn people about the known risks". If you warn people about the small risk of blood clots from the vacci
by ars 6y ago
No, it's not "too dangerous", rather it's "we did not warn people about the known risks".
If you warn people about the small risk of blood clots from the vaccine, then you can let them decide if to receive it.
That's what informed consent is all about.
- ChadHomenim 6y agoThe company that is still litigating the fact that it knowingly put asbestos in baby powered made a dangerous vaccine? Color me shocked.
- thomasfromcdnjs 6y agoHonest question, what is your take on vaccine passports?
- jsight 6y agoNot the OP, but my take is that the name is terrible. The concept is probably needed in some places, though. It'd be fairly shocking if there aren't some strict entry requirements on crowded venues for a while, though maybe a recent test can substitute for a vaccine.