3 ms·
so, let me get this straight. you have vaccines that use a new tech (mrna) that are awesome and vaccines that use “old tech” and at least 2 of then produce bloo
by rantwasp 6y ago
so, let me get this straight. you have vaccines that use a new tech (mrna) that are awesome and vaccines that use “old tech” and at least 2 of then produce blood clots?
something is weird here. i’m not saying this is due to mass hysteria generated by people that don’t want the vaccine but this does sure look like a case where we don’t understand relative risk.
i may be ignorant and not understand all the factors but I don’t see the data that allows me to understand if suspending this vaccine is a good thing or nkt.
- opinicus 6y agoThe J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines are both based on adenovirus vectors. This platform has a little more history, having been used in a recent ebola vaccine, but the number of doses administered has been relatively tiny. I'd say both vector-based and mRNA very new, pioneering tech.