4 ms·
> Entrenched money stabilizes the world. It stabilizes the world into a corrupt distopia where those people rule only to entrench themselves and their friends
by adriancr 6y ago
> Entrenched money stabilizes the world.
It stabilizes the world into a corrupt distopia where those people rule only to entrench themselves and their friends (incompetent and malign as they are)
What you are describing is the old feudalism approach where aristocracy controlled everything. How well did that turn out for the serfs?, then how did it work out historically for everyone?, how many are still around?
- Spivak 6y agoBut entrenching themselves is a benign end. I don’t really care that very very wealthy people exist and seek to carve out exceptions for themselves to maintain that wealth. The harm that’s done is vague and more the realm of economics. But very very wealthy people who want to “change the world” are individuals with the monetary weight of tens of thousands of people and can do things that for others would require and naturally be tempered by cooperation.
- ameister14 6y agoWhen has concentrated and entrenched wealth ever been a benign end?