3 ms·
Sure. As long as you were super rich. They were $10-$15 per 60W equivalent bulb and you couldn't get ones that were 90W equivalent. The only bulbs that were rem
by jtbayly 6y ago
Sure. As long as you were super rich. They were $10-$15 per 60W equivalent bulb and you couldn't get ones that were 90W equivalent. The only bulbs that were remotely close to affordable were CFLs that were terrible.
And you know what? The LED bulbs I've owned don't last 10k hours, either.
Edit: And now they are selling light fixtures with the LED's integrated and non-replaceable. So when the bulb goes out you have to throw the fixture out and replace the whole stupid thing. Talk about land-fill increase. Not to mention the risk of electrocution and/or fire from consumers trying to do wiring themselves, or the waste of paying an electrician to replace your light bulb...
- caslon 6y ago> Edit: And now they are selling light fixtures with the LED's integrated and non-replaceable. Market!
- jtbayly 6y agoYou claimed light bulbs were just fine when the gov regulations came in. They weren't. It would be nice if you would admit it instead of just misdirecting the conversation. But to reply to your misdirection, the integrated LED bulbs are downwind from the government regulation, which was propped up by lies from people like you who claimed that LED bulbs would last functionally forever. Edit: Somebody also claimed that the new gas cans are just fine. I think you guys are just gaslighting me. I'm out.