3 ms·
The first part of your comment is arguing for the second justification. Which I agreed was logically fine to do, and I think you laid out the case well. The se
by ashtonbaker 6y ago
The first part of your comment is arguing for the second justification. Which I agreed was logically fine to do, and I think you laid out the case well.
The second part seems to reveal a difference in opinion unlikely to be resolved easily in this forum. Food for thought, though - thank you!
- d110af5ccf 6y agoWhoops, I didn't mean it to read like that. I actually happen to agree with you (that social status is a likely factor in certain cases for VC, and that people often seem uncomfortable about acknowledging such things). I was just trying to illustrate that it's at least possible for someone's behavior to appear dogmatic when in reality their mental model is carefully reasoned but differs from yours.
- ashtonbaker 5y agoFor sure, point well taken. There is a question of differing goals and values there between me and the "startup" or "get rich" people, I think, but I suppose we all have our own dogma in the end.